Sirotablog

David Sirota is a political journalist and nationally syndicated newspaper columnist at Creators Syndicate. David writes about political corruption, globalization and working-class economic issues often ignored by both of America's political parties.

  • August 15, 2008 8:50 AM

    Buh Bayh

    In the last week, the national media has ramped up its speculation that Indiana senator Evan Bayh is going to be named to the vice-presidential ticket by Barack Obama. Mind you, this is all speculation - this is what our national media now substitutes for actual reporting. What's worse, the same media hasn't really looked at who Bayh is, what he would represent, and why there is a growing backlash to the prospect of him being Obama's runningmate. So I did that in my newspaper column today.

    I'll let you read the column for the rundown of what I think Bayh would do to the Democratic Party should he be nominated. What I want to explore here is the concept that he's a "safe" pick - because that's the underlying rationale for selecting him.

    The traditional definition of "safe" in vice-presidential politics is someone without any secret skeletons in their closet. The Tom Eagleton disaster in 1972 made this the number-one priority for Democrats for the last generation, explaining truly unimpressive picks like Lloyd Bensten and Joe Lieberman.

    The problem with this definition of "safe" is that it creates a separate danger - namely, the nomination of someone who demoralizes (or at least fails to energize) voters, and also refuses to put the heat on the opposing ticket. Think Lieberman i 2000 - a DLCer who demoralized the progressive base and spent the vice-presidential debates telling the country how great Dick Cheney is.

    The true definition of a "safe" pick is someone who 1) has a respectable history of service or of winning elections 2) will energize key constituencies and 3) will go on the offense against the opposing ticket. If a potential candidate like Bayh is only #1, but not #2 and #3, then he's unsafe, because he hurts the ticket's chances of winning.

    Obviously, it's not productive to show why one candidate would be terrible without offering up some ideas for possible runningmates. You can see my personal suggestions in this earlier column.

    To read this week's full column, go to The San Francisco Chronicle, The Denver Post, The Ft. Collins Coloradoan, The Lewiston Sun-Journal, In These Times, TruthDig, Credo Action or Creators Syndicate.

    The column relies on grassroots support, so if you'd like to see my column regularly in your local paper, use this directory to find the contact info for your local editorial page editors. Get get in touch with them and point them to my Creators Syndicate site. Thanks, as always, for your ongoing readership and help contacting local editors. This column couldn't be what it is without your help.

Discussion

  • JumperPin [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Replaceable through appointment by Republican governor, Bayh should have never even been on the "long list".

    Biden brings too much disagreement (and himself) for VP. But he's perfect where he's at.

    Sibelius is a lightweight.

    Clinton(s) is(are) the unwieldy heavyweight(s).

    Richardson might "crowd" the ticket with yet another minority. But he'd be perfect in cabinet.

    Hey all, forget Hagel and Nunn. OK?

    Kaine's time is passing - especially w/ Ossetia thingy.

    So only Wes Clark is left standing?

    Posted on August 15, 2008 9:40 AM
  • ACD [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    As Sirota wrote in the column - "why not pick the Buckeye State's anti-war and anti-NAFTA Sen. Sherrod Brown?"

    I agree. As an Ohioan and supporter of Sherrod Brown's (though I'm a bit concerned about what it said in the Uprising, about Brown considering "the Hillary Clinton model"), I'm dissapointed that Sherrod Brown has, to my knowledge, never even been mentioned as a possible VP pick. I think he'd be perfect for it. An economic populist from an important swing state. A Democratic governor who could name a replacement.

    I really hope it's not Bayh. Biden would be acceptable. I don't think Tim Kaine would bring much to the ticket. I'm starting to think it may be Clark though. With Bill Clinton speaking before the VP, it's starting to make sense.

    Posted on August 15, 2008 9:51 AM

Join the Discussion

Post a comment