Sirotablog

David Sirota is a political journalist and nationally syndicated newspaper columnist at Creators Syndicate. David writes about political corruption, globalization and working-class economic issues often ignored by both of America's political parties.

  • February 7, 2008 10:15 AM

    A Short-Term Solution to the Potential Superdelegate Problem

    There's a lot of legitimate concern out there about so-called superdelegates deciding who receives the Democratic presidential nomination. Superdelegates, as a refresher, are delegates (mostly elected officials) who are free floaters - they can decide who to support for the nomination without any regard to the outcomes of primaries or caucuses. Your state voted for Obama? Sorry, your state's superdelegates are fully allowed to cast their nominating votes for Clinton. Same thing the other way around - it's just straight up undemocratic.

    As I discuss more fully in my upcoming book, The Uprising, superdelegate system was created to make sure the party Establishment - not rank-and-file voters - gets control over the nomination. And if such superdelegates make up the margin of victory for the nominee this year, then it means the Establishment will have control over who the nominee is - not us the voters.

    So how do we prevent the Democratic nomination from becoming a smoky backroom deal? The Chairman of the Maine Democratic Party provides a model.

    Here's a press release that just came over the transom:

    Party Chairman John Knutson Announces his Choice for President

    AUGUSTA- This Sunday, Democrats all over Maine will participate in the Maine Democratic Party Caucus and choose who they want to nominate as this year's Democratic presidential candidate. The results of the caucus will determine how Maine's 24 Delegates to the Democratic National Convention are allocated. Above and beyond the state delegates, who are allocated through the caucus and State Convention, Maine also has 10 unpledged delegates, called "Super-Delegates," who are able to support any candidate they choose.

    These "Super-Delegates" are made up of elected officials like our Governor and two Congressmen, as well as party leaders like John Knutson, who is Chair of the Maine Democratic Party.

    On Thursday, Knutson announced that he will support the candidate who wins the majority of the vote in Maine. "For all intents and purposes, Maine now has 25 delegates up for grabs since I will be embracing the candidate who wins Maine's caucuses," said Knutson. As a Super-Delegate, Knutson will represent this winning candidate at the Democratic National Convention.

    Knutson continued, "I see this as a way to further empower Democrats across the state of Maine and make the results of our caucus more influential. It is clear that this Presidential campaign will come down to a race for delegates, and I believe that by pledging to support the winner of Maine's caucuses, I will help to increase Maine's importance in the nomination process."

    This is a smart and moral move by Knutson - and one we should start encouraging everywhere. We're not going to be able to reform the superdelegate system before this year's convention, so the best we can hope for is pressure on existing superdelegates to simply represent how their states voted. This is a short-term solution and in no way would substitute for longer-term reform of the nominating process. But within the confines of this specific election, this solution is critically important.

    Find out who the superdelegates are in your state, and then start putting pressure on them to do what Knutson did. We've got to get ahead of this thing before the horse-trading and backroom dealing starts.

Discussion

  • waltc [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Get rid of the superdelegates if you want a honest system that actually embraces democracy rather than the potemkin village version we have now.

    But its doubtful the Democrats would ever do this considering how corrupt and dictatorial the party bosses are. Does anyone think they'll relinquish their power over who become president? no!

    Posted on February 7, 2008 10:50 AM
  • maxpayne [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Man, I can't tell you how this delegate crap makes my wife so sick and tired of watching "elections" getting rigged. Next week, I'm supposed to vote since I live in VA. However, my wife and I agree that by now, it's all reduced to supercrappy candidates. The superdelegate trick is just the worst trick any party could rely on. Then again, it's only one of many tricks the Establishment uses to keep winning every time. We need to take note of all the tricks the Establishment uses to rig the elections to their own benefit. Until then, we're stuck with rank-and-file voters who are too dumb enough to argue that "see, I can pick between the two candidates so the US is a democracy!" And I get this kind of remark from both social cons and social-only libs.

    P.S.: If Obama is a "populist", then why is his victory heavily dependent on caucuses compared to Hillary's? Then again, all that's left are establishment candidates in both parties save Huckabee.

    Posted on February 7, 2008 1:35 PM
  • robert beal [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    I'm just guessing that Democratic Party of Oregon won't get around to answering my e-mail requesting the names of our state's superdelegates.

    In 2004 they sure as heck didn't want to hear about dissatisfaction with their squelching of pre-primary appearances at party events by challengers to the incumbent governor.

    Posted on February 7, 2008 10:06 PM

Join the Discussion

Post a comment