Sirotablog
David Sirota is a political journalist and nationally syndicated newspaper columnist at Creators Syndicate. David writes about political corruption, globalization and working-class economic issues often ignored by both of America's political parties.
-
October 4, 2007 10:31 AM
GAO Says FCC Leaking Inside Info to Lobbyists
Check this out from the Los Angeles Times today:
"From giant phone companies to small consumer advocates, the Federal Communications Commission is supposed to treat every group equally. But congressional investigators have found some companies and trade groups have received special treatment. FCC officials tipped them off to confidential information about when regulators planned to vote on important issues -- a clear violation of agency rules that provided an unfair lobbying advantage, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office released today. Other interested parties -- generally consumer and public-interest groups -- did not get such favorable treatment, the report said...With oversight of many aspects of telephone, TV, radio and Internet services, the FCC has a major effect on people's lives. Its decisions also can affect entire sectors of the telecommunications industry. Privileged information, leaked in violation of FCC rules, could give some companies and organizations advantages when trying to sway the commission, the GAO said."
This revelation comes less than a year after the Wall Street Journal reported that K Street lobbying firms have created an entire cottage industry to dig out insider information from Washington. Corporate interests are "hiring lobbyists -- not to influence government, but to tell them what it's going to do," the report said, adding that:
"Several lobbying firms are ramping up their "political-intelligence" units and charging hedge funds between $5,000 and $20,000 a month for tips and predictions...the SEC is trying to resolve is whether the passing of market-sensitive information by lobbyists to investors could violate insider-trading law...lobbyists only have to disclose their work for clients seeking to influence government, while hedge funds and other clients seeking market-beating tips can stay in the shadows. Increasingly, lobbyists acting as advocates for a company on an issue may also have a client looking to trade on information about the same issue...The growth in the market for political intelligence in the last 18 months has been dramatic."
Coincidence that the FCC is leaking inside information to corporate interests at the same time corporate interests are ramping up their efforts to use Washington lobbyists in a shady scheme to gather insider information? I think not.

Discussion
The FCC deserves to be ABOLISHED. The fucked up agency does nothing about the vulgar content on the corporate media even though it's supposed to. Too bad the supposedly "small government" folks are AWFULLY silent or even speak against those who are for ABOLISHING THE FCC.
Conservatives never really wanted to ABOLISH the government. Hell, they're not for ABOLISHing but empowering the FCC, FBI, NSA, DEA, CIA, Corporate Welfare SHITPOTz, military, navy, marines, Pentagon, etc ... Even on the non-defense departments, all they ever do is CORRUPT them with VERY LAZY federal employees who have nothing to lose because they know that they won't get fired whereas contractors can be kicked out anytime. Starting with RAYGUN in 1981, they were hell bent set on forming a BIGGER and NASTIER government ready to SUPERMAXIMIZE POVERTY and TERRORISM against all who voted these motherfuckers into office. As David Michael Green points out about these rightwing NAZIs:
When Reagan first went down this path it was so weird that a conspiracy theory of sorts arose. The notion was that Republicans knew they could not possibly go through the front door to successfully kill popular programs like Social Security and Medicare, even if they were willing to risk political suicide to do so. So Reagan’s agenda was a back-door approach, instead. Driving up the debt to completely unsustainable levels, the story went, America would be faced with a series of uncomfortable choices as collectors came demanding their payments. The country could either raise taxes, cut military spending, or slash social programs. The idea was that, of the three, the last of these would seem to the public like the least worst choice. And then conservatives could surreptitiously achieve a long-held goal, best expressed by Grover Norquist, right-wing tax crusader extraordinaire: “I don’t want to abolish government, I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.” By “government”, of course, he means the parts that help people, not the parts that kill people. For the right, those parts are okay. If not beloved.
Join the Discussion