Sirotablog

David Sirota is a political journalist and nationally syndicated newspaper columnist at Creators Syndicate. David writes about political corruption, globalization and working-class economic issues often ignored by both of America's political parties.

  • July 23, 2007 2:06 PM

    Republicans Squandering Their Opportunity In Kentucky

    It wasn't long ago that Republicans dominated the nation's governorships. In 2000, Republicans held the Governor's mansion in 31 states, compared to just 17 for Democrats (Independents held two). Less than seven years later, Democrats now hold a 28 to 22 lead, with those states accounting for 295 electoral votes (up from 207 before the election). And according to the latest Rothenberg Political Report, Democrats are poised to hold as many as 30 seats by the end of next year.

    While Republican governors in Democratic states have become an endangered species, the same cannot be said for Democratic governors in red states where they hold the office in the less-friendly confines of Wyoming, Kansas, Oklahoma, Montana, North Carolina and Virginia, just to name a few.

    Dems in Red StatesGOP in Blue States

    Nowhere is this trend more evident than in Kentucky, a state which President Bush won by a hefty 60-40 margin in 2004, and where Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R) appears nearly out of oxygen, after roaring into office in 2003 as the first Republican governor in 32 years. Kentucky is one of just three states to hold gubernatorial elections this year (along with Louisiana and Mississippi).

    Following two years of near-constant scandal and a grand jury investigation that forced him to preemptively pardon his entire administration (whether or not they were indicted), invoke his own 5th Amendment rights instead of testifying, getting himself indicted on political corruption charges, and then having his own lieutenant governor bolt from the ticket and support his primary challenger...it's not so good to be red in the Bluegrass State right now, especially for Ernie Fletcher.

    But to appreciate the depth of Fletcher's electability problem, you need not look any further at any public polling having to do with Fletcher in the past few months -- regardless of whether the poll is testing his job performance or a general election matchup against former Lt. Gov. Steve Beshear (D):

    --Jul 16, Survey USA: Fletcher 36% (Beshear 59%)
    --Jul 16, Survey USA, job approval: Fletcher 39%
    --Jul 9, Insider Advantage: Fletcher 38% (Beshear 41%)
    --Jun 1, Survey USA, job approval: Fletcher 39%
    --May 25, Rasmussen: Fletcher 35% (Beshear 51%)
    --May 24, Survey USA: Fletcher 34% (Beshear 62%)
    --May 14, Survey USA, job approval: Fletcher 38%
    --Apr 16, Survey USA job approval: Fletcher 36%

    As is abundantly clear, Fletcher can't get beyond his most hard-core base on any measurement. Be it a straight-up job approval, or a general election match-up, every poll is showing that more than 60% of Kentucky voters want nothing to do with Fletcher on any level. Amazingly, Fletcher has not cracked 40% job approval in any of the past 30 Survey USA monthly polls. (I'm told that Beshear's internal polling shows him blasting Fletcher by a 55-35 margin, which is very consistent with the numbers above.)

    On Friday, Pollster.com offered a similar assessment of Fletcher's grave problem, as it related to just the general election polling:

    The most striking thing to me in the Kentucky results is the relative consistency in support for Fletcher across all four polls. Fletcher's support varies within a four point range (34% to 38%), while support for Beshear varies widely (from 41% to 62%). That pattern is not unusual in a race involving a well known incumbent, particularly when the incumbent is embattled by various scandals that have lowered his job performance rating to just 39% of adults. Attitudes about the incumbent typically drive voter preference at this stage of the race, lesser known challengers typically gain support as the campaign progresses.

    Collectively, these results suggest trouble ahead for Governor Fletcher unless he can convince a big chunk of Kentucky voters to either reconsider his performance as governor or rule out Steve Beshear as a credible alternative.

    Compounding Fletcher's already bad situation is the clear drop-off of Republican Party registration among new Kentucky voters since the 2004 election. While Kentucky voters have exhibited a clear shift to the Republican column on Election Day over the past decade, Democrats continue to hold a 3 to 2 registration advantage, and as was the case in a number of states during the 2006 elections (particularly in the Rocky Mountain West), many of those Republican-voting-Democrats are coming home, once again.

    Keep a close eye on what is shaping-up to be the Blowout in the Bluegrass this November.

    --Mark Nickolas

Discussion

  • butte [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Wasn't it Kentucky native, and one of the smarter Republicans, Abraham Lincoln, who said, "You can fool all the people some of the time, some of the people all the time, but you can't fool all the people all of the time"?
    They should have listened to him.
    What Lincoln didn't say, was when the public finds out they've been lied to, they get really really pissed, and they don't forget any time soon.
    Go Republicans! And don't come back!

    Posted on July 24, 2007 6:53 AM
  • maxpayne [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Are the KY Dems united at all by now? From what I remember, a great deal of the KY GOP used to be Democrats. The KY GOP can only be lucky they cashed in on a fractured opposition back in those days they gained. Still, I'd say KY was more "conservative" than VA. Like most red states, the GOP had no intention of carrying out their social conservative promises but instead satisfying their real base, the economic libertarians. I would assume that by now, the voters would be devastated beyond the point of no return for being socially betrayed and economically ripped to the core. Now would be a ripe opportunity for the KY Dems to go on the offensive and put forth economic liberal policies and not let the DC Dems or the hostile business interests control them.

    Posted on July 24, 2007 12:56 PM
  • waltc [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    I hope KY Dems have some populists to run vs a DLCer like Harold Ford, if they do they'll probably win. And whatever the KY Dems do, as Maxpayne points don't let the DC Dems or business interests call the shots. Because when the D.C. honchos get involed Democrats start losing.

    The fact is local Dems can win without D.C. meddling as in the case Jerry McNerney who beat Pombo like a drum when you are running against a out right crook and bozo. McNerney got no support from Rahm's money machine and none IMS from DNC as well.


    Posted on July 24, 2007 2:19 PM
  • Green Pajamas [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    maxpayne, that's how the GOP crushed the Democrats in Florida. Lawton Chiles was a DLCer though like Clinton, he'd play his folksy populist bullshit just to win everytime. It's no wonder he was totally silent when conservative Democrat Buzz Ritchie pulled a RACIST move against pro-populist Democrat Willie Logan and caused a racial stir in the entire state. The blacks showed their anger on the Democrats by either not voting in 1998 or voting Jeb Bush after Willie Logan protested after his ouster by encouraging black voters to go independent or even Republican ! Al Gore actually PISSED OFF a lot of black voters and even other Democratic voters by going down to Florida to try to get Willie Logan to calm down rather than smack Buzz Ritchie and Lawton Chiles for letting it all happen. But then again, Gore was also a DLCer just like the other two. Of course, if Gore had been pro-populist his entire 24 years, he would have easily won Florida and Tennessee without a hitch. And speaking of DC Democrats meddling with Florida Democrats, former DNC chairman Terry MCAWFUL along with Joe LOSERman and the other BLUEDOG/DLC reps from the state in DC did everything they could to put a corporate hack named Bill MCDOOFUS Mcbride against Reno. Of course, Reno had her flaws but was a hell of a lot better than McDOOFUS. It's bad enough that since 1982, not a single seat in the FL legislature turned from R to D but the other way around and yet the DC Dems still can't stop RAPING the FL Democrats. But ask even the black Democrats today and the only thing you'll get from them is "Look man, we gotta just shut up and win some houses. Your people crap can wait, sir !" Whether you're talking Gadsden County or Collier County, Afro or hick respectively, the difference between the two parties is nothing more than social crap according to most voters.

    Posted on July 25, 2007 8:53 PM

Join the Discussion

Post a comment